Cedar Lake, Decoy, Peg 26
This was my first-ever Rover – the club decided at our last
AGM to have just one. Cedar has 26 swims – 1 at the car park end down to 13
along one side of the strip, and 14-26 back up the other side; and the Car Park
end often tends to fish a little better than the other end. I picked out peg 9
so would be ninth to choose a swim.
Peg 1 went to Tony, a very good angler, who immediately
picked Peg 1. This has reeds in the corner, but bare bank just past them which
can be reached with only about four sections of a pole. It’s the obvious
choice, especially as today there was a cold wind which would be slightly behind
him. But the wind was blowing down towards the other end, which must have
influenced the next anglers to pick pegs, as they opted to go down the strip in the wind.
I was ninth to choose and was amazed that swim 26, in the
opposite corner, was still available, so I had it! Bushes along the car park
bank meant that there was no ripple, and that part of the end bank, to my left,
is reed-lined, which makes it difficult to fish in the edge. But I had fished
it a few weeks before, and know that good weights have come from it since then.
Amazingly, even after all 17 had picked their swims, pegs 2, 3 and 4 were left
blank. So Tony on 1 looked to be a hot favourite in my eyes.
Three swims
I concentrated on three swims – at three sections out, down
the deep margin to my right, and in the tiny cut-out five feet to my left where there was
a shallow swim, though no more than a foot of it before it dropped down in a
series of little shelves. And before I
had had a bite Tony was into fish from a swim his end bank about three feet deep. After a short while I saw
he had lengthened his pole to about 11 metres (has was using one transfer section) to fish farther alonng the end bank and he never wavered from that. He had several more before I had my first fish, which was on
corn at three sections.
I wondered whether to go farther out and try shallow,
dropping down later, but the forecast was for the wind to strengthened (which
it did), so I stayed on that line and after 45 minutes had two carp about 2 lb
each on corn, though I first tried 6mm expander. After 90 minutes I asked Alan,
next door, how many fish he had, and the answer was four. I had five at that
point. Tony was still catching steadily and I reckoned he must have had over 40 lb!
So in an effort to make something happen I fed the right margin with corn and
hemp, and immediately had indications on cat meat. In the next 30 minutes I
managed three or four carp, and was surprised not to hit a barbel, as then tend
to feed right at the bottom of the shelf.
For the next two hours I alternated between those two swims,
taking a fish every few minutes, and it was noticeable that if I left the outer
swim without feeding it, next time I dropped in I got a bream. It seemed the
carp would come onto feed very quickly buit would leave it just as quickly, and
the bream would come in to mop it up.
I try the shallow margin
I had had an occasional drop-in to the left shallow margin
swim, with no result after putting in just half-a-dozen grains of corn. So with
just under two hours to go I put in half a big pot of corn, hemp and a little
cat meat. Within a minute fish were swirling in the side, so I put in a my
shallow rig at 18 inches deep, with the Maver Invincible floats I love, and hit
a five-pounder immediately. After that the fish seemed to drop down the shelf
and I kept adding six inches at a time until I found more fish. However I
always like to rest swims, especially if it’s cool (and it was!) so I
alternated between the two margin swims for the rest of the match, taking carp
and, later, the odd barbel on cat meat from the deep swim, and just carp on corn from
the shallow swim.
Tony seemed to have longer periods of inactivity and I began
to wonder whether I could catch him. He went for a third net with about an hour
to go, and I followed a little later. I was playing a fish at the end of the
match, and it turned out to be a good one at about 8 lb. I recall losing just
three fish, all foulhooked I believe, by the way they swam.
Scale problems
Tony was first to weigh, totalling 103 lb, but the scalesmen
began to wonder whether the scales were playing up, and by the time they had
got round to peg 20 or so it became obvious that they were! Nets of 40 lb or so
were showing 21 lb on the digital scales. Mike got a spring balance out of his
car but the scalesmen didn’t realise it weighed 30 maximum (two revolutions)
for another couple of pegs, so everything over 30 lb appeared to regsiter as 32
lb.
I can’t remember in the end how my nets were weighed, though
I know I split the last two so they were correct. My total was 113 lb and in
the kerfuffle I forgot to photograph the result! Tony thought he ghad at least
110 lb, so his weight was probably understated, but I thought I had at least
115 lb so mine probably was also.
Joe is 87 and still catching 'em! |
The result
I was declared the winner with 113 lb, Tony had 103 lb, with
Stuart on 88 lb and Dave on 84 lb. I would have been happy to see the match
declared void, but the final result was probably about right, although the
points towards the Club Championship were probably incorrect!
My mate Alan is a good bowler as well. |
No comments:
Post a Comment