Cedar Lake, Decoy, peg 20
This was the first Fenland Rods club match of the year, fished by 16.
There’s water lying everywhere on the fields, and the water level was well up,
leaving the platform on peg 22 (which has been one of the hot pegs during the
Winter, partially underwater, so it wasn’t pegged. However, from the results it
looks as if the fish have spread out, so 22 and the peg opposite, Number 6,
probably won’t necessarily be better than the rest from now on. My swim was almost
eight feet deep – showing how much extra water is in the lakes after this
incredibly wet spell we’ve had.
The weather was really uncomfortable – a cold North-Easterly
(not the mild weather forecast) and persistent rain from start to finish (hence
no pictures) – not heavy, but enough to soak everything and to make my hands cold.
By the end I was shivering, even though the wind on our bank was from behind. But I was, at least, on the £100 Golden Peg!
Fish first cast!
I started on a Method feeder with a pop-up and hit a carp of
3 lb first cast, followed immediately by one of 6 lb. A third cast brought
nothing so I had a quick look in the deep-water margin swim, which was just as deep, where I had been
throwing maggots. A 4 lb barbel was the first fish – foulhooked. This was
followed by another, smaller fish, and after a blank ten minutes I decided to
have a look at 13 metres, which was where I imagined my main swim would be,
putting in about ten grains of corn and a few micros with each drop-in.
Again, first cast produced a carp, of about 4 lb, to corn,
but it never produced fish regularly. I could see liners coming every minute or
two, but didn’t strike until it looked like a bite, and they came only at
intervals of about 10 minutes. A couple were foulhooked so I looked up in the
water at various depths, but never had a bite! Back on the bottom came another
bite or two, and another fish foulhooked.
Barbel in the side
So it was back, for the moment, to the side swim, where
another couple of barbel came, and then the swim died. The float kept dipping
but not turning into a bite, and I am convinced these were barbel snuffling
around the bait but not taking it. I’ve noticed this before when barbel are in
the swim. Back to 13 metres with corn
and another couple of fish foulhooked. At one point about 90 minutes before the
end I foulhooked four fish in four casts at 13 metres, landing the first three.
Among those I had lost I’m convinced there were some over 4 lb - although
foulhooked, they felt like sacks of potatoes, rather than dashing around
everywhere.
From what I could see not a lot of fish were being caught,
so I thought that perhaps I might frame, but was annoyed I had foulhooked (and lost) so
many fish. Afterwards I found that a lot of anglers had the same problem, and
an angler on Oak Lake, behind me, told me the same thing. Of course, landing
foulhooked fish is partially down to luck – there’s no standard way of playing
and landing them that I know of. The worst, I have found, are those hooked in
the tail, and those hooked in the nose.
A short spell on cat meat down the side, which produced just
one 2 lb bream. In the last half-hour, with about 50 lb in the net, I put in
two bait-droppers of maggots into the side swim, hoping this would keep the
roach away, and took three more barbel to 4 lb, two hooked on the outside of
the lip, which further convinced me they were taking the bait only
half-heartedly.
The (rather wet) results sheet. |
To my right Tony Nisbet fished at 6 metres, after taking a
few fish down the side, and took fish regularly on a 6mm expander, to win with
85 lb 4 oz, and I was second with 64 lb 4 oz. But the weights were spread
around pretty evenly, and I was impressed that on such a difficult day my mates
caught as many as they did. It was the sort of day when, because of the cold
and wet, I just could not bring myself
to get up and start adding extra sections, or putting on different rigs.
The one
thing I should have done was to follow Tony’s lead and start a new swim at six
metres, which would have been much easier to fish. But I didn’t actually
realise he was catching so many fish. Mike Rawson took almost all barbel down the side on a maggot feeder - something I believe I should try more often. But you can't do everything.
So a pretty good result for me...but no £100 to put in my back pocket. I know that a good
angler would have found a way of avoiding those foulhooked fish. However, hats
off to Tony. My next match is in two weeks time, on Elm. Hopefully it will be a
little warmer.
No comments:
Post a Comment